| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CATUPDATE confusion? |
| Date: | 2015-03-03 21:32:27 |
| Message-ID: | 54F6286B.90802@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/28/15 6:32 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> This isn't really /etc/shadow though, this is more like direct access to
> the filesystem through the device node- and you'll note that Linux
> certainly has got an independent set of permissions for that called the
> capabilities system. That's because messing with those pieces can crash
> the kernel. You're not going to crash the kernel if you goof up
> /etc/shadow.
I think this characterization is incorrect. The Linux capability system
does not exist because the actions are scary or can crash the kernel.
Capabilities exist because they are not attached to file system objects
and can therefore not be represented using the usual permission system.
Note that one can write directly to raw devices or the kernel memory
through various /dev and /proc files. No "capability" protects against
that. It's only the file permissions, possibly in combination with
mount options.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2015-03-03 21:34:32 | Re: Idea: GSoC - Query Rewrite with Materialized Views |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-03-03 20:49:06 | Re: Idea: GSoC - Query Rewrite with Materialized Views |