Re: remove pg_standby?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: remove pg_standby?
Date: 2015-02-27 20:00:35
Message-ID: 54F0CCE3.7080507@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/10/2014 10:54 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>> pg_standby is more configurable than the built-in standby_mode=on. You can
>> set the sleep time, for example, while standby_mode=on uses a hard-coded
>> delay of 5 s. And pg_standby has a configurable maximum wait time. And as
>> Fujii pointed out, the built-in system will print an annoying message to the
>> log every time it attempts to restore a file. Nevertheless, 99% of users
>> would probably be happy with the built-in thing.
>
> As long as pg_standby has features that are actually useful and that
> are not in the built-in system, we shouldn't remove it. We should,
> however, try to fix those in the main system so we can get rid of it
> after that :)

As of current 9.5, we have configurable retries and standby delay in
mainstream. Is there some reason we still need pg_standby?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-02-27 20:01:22 Re: logical column ordering
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-02-27 19:57:54 Re: logical column ordering