| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: logical column ordering |
| Date: | 2015-02-26 21:55:44 |
| Message-ID: | 54EF9660.1050307@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/26/2015 01:54 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This patch decouples these three things so that they
> can changed freely -- but provides no user interface to do so. I think
> that trying to only decouple the thing we currently have in two pieces,
> and then have a subsequent patch to decouple again, is additional
> conceptual complexity for no gain.
Oh, I didn't realize there weren't commands to change the LCO. Without
at least SQL syntax for LCO, I don't see why we'd take it; this sounds
more like a WIP patch.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grzegorz Parka | 2015-02-26 21:59:50 | GSoC idea - Simulated annealing to search for query plans |
| Previous Message | Rahila Syed | 2015-02-26 21:54:04 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |