| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org >> PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Odd behavior of updatable security barrier views on foreign tables |
| Date: | 2015-02-19 02:30:04 |
| Message-ID: | 54E54AAC.3030100@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015/02/18 21:44, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Etsuro Fujita (fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp) wrote:
>> On 2015/02/18 7:44, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> Attached is a patch which should address this. Would love your (or
>>> anyone else's) feedback on it. It appears to address the issue which
>>> you raised and the regression test changes are all in-line with
>>> inserting a LockRows into the subquery, as anticipated.
>>
>> I've looked into the patch.
>>
>> * The patch applies to the latest head, 'make' passes successfully,
>> but 'make check' fails in the rowsecurity test.
>
> Apologies for not being clear- the patch was against 9.4, where it
> passes all the regression tests (at least for me- if you see
> differently, please let me know!).
Sorry, I assumed that the patch was against HEAD. I comfermed that the
back-patched 9.4 passes all the regression tests!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-02-19 02:31:40 | Re: Allow "snapshot too old" error, to prevent bloat |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-02-19 02:16:09 | Re: anyarray |