Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates
Date: 2015-01-23 01:58:46
Message-ID: 54C1AAD6.9040708@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23/01/15 00:40, Andreas Karlsson wrote:

> - Renamed some things from int12 to int128, there are still some places
> with int16 which I am not sure what to do with.
>

I'd vote for renaming them to int128 too, there is enough C functions
that user int16 for 16bit integer that this is going to be confusing
otherwise.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2015-01-23 02:27:34 Re: pg_upgrade and rsync
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-01-23 01:54:47 Re: pg_upgrade and rsync