| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
| Date: | 2015-01-18 16:05:46 |
| Message-ID: | 54BBD9DA.1020101@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/18/15 8:16 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-01-18 22:02:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Gierth
>>> 2) in any event it is essentially deprecated in favour of standby_mode
>>> and therefore moving it to src/bin seems like a wrong move on two counts?
>> There were some discussions about that a couple of months ago, and the
>> conclusion was to not remove it. Please see here for more information:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/545946E9(dot)8060504(at)gmx(dot)net#545946E9(dot)8060504@gmx.net
>
> Sure, but not removing doesn't imply moving it. The other tools don't
> have a replacement and are more or less actively maintained. I don't
> think that's really the case for pg_standby. We do *not* want to give
> it more credence by declaring it to be part of core.
I don't really care much, but the discussion appeared to indicate that
pg_standby currently does not have a full replacement.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2015-01-18 17:38:54 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Fix xpath() to return namespace definitions |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-01-18 16:01:37 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |