From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | syatskevich(at)n21lab(dot)gosniias(dot)msk(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) |
Date: | 2003-05-26 20:16:54 |
Message-ID: | 5496.1053980214@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The reason it is PGC_USERSET is because we imagined people might want to
> increase the amount of information sent to the server logs, and we don't
> have an _increase_only_ restriction capability. However, maybe it
> should be PGC_SUSET.
Yeah, probably so. Particularly with the 7.4 error message additions,
it'd be possible to make the logs very verbose indeed, which might be
seen as a form of attack (or at least a good way to hide your traces).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-05-26 23:10:50 | pg_class_aclcheck: relation [oid] not found... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-26 19:05:43 | Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-05-26 20:42:16 | Re: pl/sh |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-26 19:05:43 | Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Brusser | 2003-05-26 21:07:58 | Re: Removing a user's password |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-26 19:05:43 | Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) |