Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: syatskevich(at)n21lab(dot)gosniias(dot)msk(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)
Date: 2003-05-26 20:16:54
Message-ID: 5496.1053980214@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The reason it is PGC_USERSET is because we imagined people might want to
> increase the amount of information sent to the server logs, and we don't
> have an _increase_only_ restriction capability. However, maybe it
> should be PGC_SUSET.

Yeah, probably so. Particularly with the 7.4 error message additions,
it'd be possible to make the logs very verbose indeed, which might be
seen as a form of attack (or at least a good way to hide your traces).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2003-05-26 23:10:50 pg_class_aclcheck: relation [oid] not found...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-26 19:05:43 Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-05-26 20:42:16 Re: pl/sh
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-26 19:05:43 Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Brusser 2003-05-26 21:07:58 Re: Removing a user's password
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-26 19:05:43 Re: Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)