| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: On partitioning |
| Date: | 2014-12-17 19:19:14 |
| Message-ID: | 5491D732.5050409@vmware.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/17/2014 08:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Last week, I wrote a longish email listing out the common problems users
> have with our current partitioning as a way of benchmarking the plan for
> new partitioning. While some people responded to that post, absolutely
> nobody discussed the list of issues I gave. Is that because there's
> universal agreement that I got the major issues right? Seems doubtful.
That was a good list.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-12-17 19:30:36 | Re: On partitioning |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-12-17 19:13:40 | Re: btree_gin and ranges |