Re: GiST kNN search queue (Re: KNN-GiST with recheck)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GiST kNN search queue (Re: KNN-GiST with recheck)
Date: 2014-12-16 09:23:56
Message-ID: 548FFA2C.7060000@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/15/2014 11:59 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com
>> wrote:
>
> Here's a new version of the patch. It now uses the same pairing heap code
>> that I posted in the other thread ("advance local xmin more aggressivley",
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5488ACF0.8050901@vmware.com). The
>> pairingheap_remove() function is unused in this patch, but it is needed by
>> that other patch.
>
> Under enable-cassert, this tries to call pairingheap_empty, but that
> function doesn't exist.
>
> I looked in the other patch and didn't find it defined there, either.

Ah, I renamed pairingheap_empty to pairingheap_is_empty at the last
minute, and missed the Asserts. Here's a corrected version.

- Heikki

Attachment Content-Type Size
knn-gist-pairingheap-3.patch text/x-diff 19.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-12-16 09:34:47 Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
Previous Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2014-12-16 09:23:04 Re: pg_rewind in contrib