Re: Commitfest problems

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)ilande(dot)co(dot)uk>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Commitfest problems
Date: 2014-12-16 05:18:40
Message-ID: 548FC0B0.60001@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/15/2014 07:34 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-12-15 16:14:30 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Read the thread on this list where I suggested crediting reviewers in
>> the release notes.
>
> Man. You're equating stuff that's not the same. You didn't get your way
> (and I'm tentatively on your side onthat one) and take that to imply
> that we don't want more reviewers.

During that thread a couple people said that novice reviewers added no
value to the review process, and nobody argued with them then. I've
also been told this to my face at pgCon, and when I've tried organizing
patch review events. I got the message, which is why I stopped trying
to get new reviewers.

And frankly: if we're opposed to giving credit to patch reviewers, we're
opposed to having them.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2014-12-16 05:21:49 Re: [Bug] Inconsistent result for inheritance and FOR UPDATE.
Previous Message Marc Fournier 2014-12-16 05:15:26 Re: moving Orafce from pgFoundry - pgFoundry management