| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest problems |
| Date: | 2014-12-13 09:40:10 |
| Message-ID: | 548C097A.20204@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/12/2014 06:01 AM, David G Johnston wrote:
> The "patch list" concept should be formalized, and should include a
> "targeted release" concept.
IMO, the "patch list" concept should be discarded in favour of a
"working tree list".
At this point, given the challenges the CF process faces, I can't say
I'd be sad if Pg adopted GitHub's push/pull process on their
infrastructure ... but I'm aware that's not going to happen, and I
understand at least some of the reasons why.
I'd be really happy to see the CF somewhat closer to that than a bunch
of message-id copy-and-pasting and patch emailing though.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2014-12-13 10:16:54 | pgbench -f and vacuum |
| Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2014-12-13 09:39:22 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |