| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
| Date: | 2014-12-12 13:11:31 |
| Message-ID: | 548AE983.3030804@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/9/14 4:32 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 06:10:02PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> (For pg_upgrade you also need to do something about pg_upgrade_support,
>> which is good because that is one very ugly crock.)
>
> FYI, pg_upgrade_support was segregated from pg_upgrade only because we
> wanted separate binary and shared object build/install targets.
I think the actual reason is that the makefile structure won't let you
have them both in the same directory. I don't see why you would need
separate install targets.
How about we move these support functions into the backend? It's not
like we don't already have other pg_upgrade hooks baked in all over the
place.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-12-12 13:13:44 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-12-12 13:11:01 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |