Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Date: 2024-04-30 12:07:43
Message-ID: 54858BA1-084E-4F7D-B2D1-D15505E512FF@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 26 Apr 2024, at 15:04, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> If this seems correct to you, are you okay with the rest of the fix
> and test? We could close this open item once the patch is acceptable.

From reading the discussion and the patch this seems like the right fix to me.
Does the test added here aptly cover 04e72ed617be in terms its functionality?

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Verite 2024-04-30 12:39:11 Re: Support LIKE with nondeterministic collations
Previous Message jian he 2024-04-30 11:15:35 Re: CREATE TABLE/ProcessUtility hook behavior change