Re: Any better plan for this query?..

From: Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Date: 2009-05-06 12:49:23
Message-ID: 5482c80a0905060549v33d59ec5y17479ba62117163e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

The story is simple: for the launching of MySQL 5.4 I've done a
testing comparing available on that time variations of InnoDB engines,
and at the end by curiosity started the same test with PostgreSQL
8.3.7 to see if MySQL performance level is more close to PostgreSQL
now (PG was a strong true winner before). For my big surprise MySQL
5.4 outpassed 8.3.7...
However, analyzing the PostgreSQL processing I got a feeling something
goes wrong on PG side.. So, now I've installed both 8.3.7 and 8.4beta1
to see more in depth what's going on. Currently 8.4 performs much
better than 8.3.7, but there is still a room for improvement if such a
small query may go faster :-)

Rgds,
-Dimitri

On 5/6/09, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> Dimitri wrote:
>> I've run several tests before and now going in depth to understand if
>> there is nothing wrong. Due such a single query time difference InnoDB
>> is doing 2-3 times better TPS level comparing to PostgreSQL..
>
> Why don't you use MySQL then?
> Or tune PostgreSQL?
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2009-05-06 12:53:45 Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Previous Message Dimitri 2009-05-06 12:33:13 Re: Any better plan for this query?..