Re: Proposal: Log inability to lock pages during vacuum

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Log inability to lock pages during vacuum
Date: 2014-12-01 02:46:51
Message-ID: 547BD69B.5050900@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/10/14, 7:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> On the whole, I'm +1 for just logging the events and seeing what we learn
> that way. That seems like an appropriate amount of effort for finding out
> whether there is really an issue.

Attached is a patch that does this.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Log-cleanup-lock-acquisition-failures-in-vacuum.patch text/plain 3.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip kumar 2014-12-01 06:48:41 Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-12-01 01:49:51 Re: 9.5: Better memory accounting, towards memory-bounded HashAgg