Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm?

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm?
Date: 2014-11-07 07:42:07
Message-ID: 545C77CF.5090608@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/07/2014 07:08 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/27/2014 06:02 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>
>>> I came up with the attached patches. They do three things:
>>>
>>> 1. Get rid of the 64-bit CRC code. It's not used for anything, and
>>> haven't been for years, so it doesn't seem worth spending any effort to
>>> fix them.
>>>
>>> 2. Switch to CRC-32C (Castagnoli) for WAL and other places that don't
>>> need to remain compatible across major versions.
>>>
>>>
> Will this change allow database created before this commit to be
> started after this commit?

No. You could use pg_resetxlog to fix the WAL, but I think at least
relmap files would still prevent you from starting up. You could use
pg_upgrade.

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message furuyao 2014-11-07 07:54:50 Re: inherit support for foreign tables
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-11-07 07:29:19 Re: Proposal: Log inability to lock pages during vacuum