| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: tracking commit timestamps |
| Date: | 2014-11-04 21:20:47 |
| Message-ID: | 5459432F.4010004@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 11/3/14 5:17 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Please don't name anything "committs". That looks like a misspelling of
>> something.
>>
>> There is nothing wrong with
>>
>> pg_get_transaction_commit_timestamp()
>>
>> If you want to reduce the length, lose the "get".
>>
>
> I am fine with that, I only wonder if your definition of "anything" only
> concerns the SQL interfaces or also the internals.
I'd be fine with commit_ts for internals, but not committs.
One day, you'll need a function or data structure that works with
multiple of these, and then you'll really be in naming trouble. ;-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2014-11-04 21:26:48 | Re: tracking commit timestamps |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2014-11-04 21:15:51 | Re: tracking commit timestamps |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2014-11-04 21:26:48 | Re: tracking commit timestamps |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2014-11-04 21:15:51 | Re: tracking commit timestamps |