Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices
Date: 2014-11-04 02:30:20
Message-ID: 54583A3C.2020402@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/02/2014 11:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nothing that I recall at the moment, but there is certainly plenty of
> stuff of dubious quality in there. I'd argue that chkpass, intagg,
> intarray, isn, spi, and xml2 are all in worse shape than the money type.

Why are we holding on to xml2 again?

FWIW, I'd be fine with moving ISN, intarray and intagg to PGXN. In
fact, I think it would be better for them to be there. And they're not
core types, so there shouldn't be an issue with that.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-11-04 02:44:22 Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-11-04 02:27:34 Re: [PG-XC] how to pass a value(String) from coordinator node to all data nodes