Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-Jun-27, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Um ... it's accounting for revmap pages already (which is why it needs
>> this field set), so hasn't that ship sailed?
> Yes, but does it need to know how many items there are in a revmap page?
Dunno, I just can't get excited about exposing REVMAP_PAGE_MAXITEMS.
Especially not since we seem to agree on the long-term solution here,
and what you're suggesting to Julien doesn't particularly fit into
that long-term solution.
regards, tom lane