Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date: 2014-10-30 21:45:20
Message-ID: 5452B170.8030801@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/30/14, 3:19 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com <mailto:Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>> wrote:
> > Patch applies against current HEAD and builds, but I'm getting 37 failed
> > tests (mostly parallel, but also misc and WITH; results attached). Is that
> > expected?
> This is caused by the recent commit 7b1c2a0 (that I actually participated in reviewing :p) because of a missing inclusion of ruleutils.h in index.c.

Sorry, forgot to mention patch now passes make check cleanly.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-10-30 21:52:57 Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2014-10-30 21:44:49 Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0