Re: Centos 5 postgis2_92 packages

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Harris <michael(dot)harris(at)ericsson(dot)com>, "pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Centos 5 postgis2_92 packages
Date: 2014-10-18 16:59:42
Message-ID: 54429C7E.4060800@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/17/2014 12:25 AM, Jeff Frost wrote:
>
> The naming seems fine to me and then we can have the new package
> name deprecate the old one.

Seems sensible; just Obsoletes: and Provides: it.

I question how much effort should be spent on supporting such an
extremely obsolete platform though.

- --
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUQpx4AAoJELBXNkqjr+S2vHkH/j0dCx9KKtbt0CPkLbJHYw/l
9GmJFFxwlJyPuA+BmrwU49vkv8EDFzi7tza+QlJIrYc/FA43Zw3tI72xROuZsvoR
AH0v5PeM6YO85S4oTPU1iGgB+AHiwZ8LUOFblIjVg+KX1uN9In0g51eP1eVRoXM1
G7eUlWkUHTrFB4xsN2YCcUX0YCfQorP6keAgJ5M5qGhyz4/CBltVbFixwZN5y6n+
mdm3hX/Un60HcXXoLoIHWkxbTwMf6rso329yhw66P66rKVOJ2HvpuxGNwMz4+BJQ
KbteWbmgYrC0HmGFDeKOrzNBoPYXlSJL0nnMHm8ghv50T0waaskmd3RJhNThygk=
=JKIr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Harris 2014-10-19 23:30:47 Re: Centos 5 postgis2_92 packages
Previous Message Devrim Gündüz 2014-10-17 19:22:03 Re: postgresql version 9.1.14 for RHEL 5 64 bits