Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch
Date: 2014-10-17 21:49:05
Message-ID: 54418ED1.4020201@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/17/14, 11:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> writes:
>> This week we had one of the most annoying problems I've ever encountered
>> with postgres. We had a big index on multiple columns, say, foo(a, b,
>> c). According to pg_stat_all_indexes the index was being used *all the
>> time*. However, after looking into our queries more closely, it turns
>> out that it was only being used to look up statistics for the foo.a
>> column to estimate merge scan viability during planning. But this took
>> hours for two people to track down.
>
>> So what I'd like to have is a way to be able to distinguish between
>> indexes being used to answer queries, and ones being only used for stats
>> lookups during planning.
>
> Why? Used is used.

Because I don't need a 30GB index on foo(a,b,c) to look up statistics.
If I ever have a problem, I can replace it with a 5GB one on foo(a).

.marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2014-10-17 21:59:10 Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-10-17 21:47:59 Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch