From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> |
Subject: | Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression |
Date: | 2014-09-15 19:09:58 |
Message-ID: | 54173986.1000602@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/15/2014 10:23 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> Now, large small keys could be 200 or 2000, or even 20k. I'd guess
> several should be tested to find the shape of the curve.
Well, we know that it's not noticeable with 200, and that it is
noticeable with 100K. It's only worth testing further if we think that
having more than 200 top-level keys in one JSONB value is going to be a
use case for more than 0.1% of our users. I personally do not.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2014-09-15 19:15:47 | Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2014-09-15 19:01:43 | Re: Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses |