Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware
Date: 2003-05-15 03:24:42
Message-ID: 5416.1052969082@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> SET CONSTRAINTS still does what it used to do, which is to alter the
>> behavior of all constraints with the given name. We should probably
>> expand the syntax so that a particular table name can be mentioned.

> Is this a TODO?

Nobody objected to my statement, so I guess so ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-15 03:37:05 Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-15 03:13:48 Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware