| From: | Tomonari Katsumata <katsumata(dot)tomonari(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest status |
| Date: | 2014-09-12 01:35:10 |
| Message-ID: | 54124DCE.80507@po.ntts.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I've update my entry.
[rounding up time value less than its unit]
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1507
regards,
-----------------
Tomonari Katsumata
(2014/09/12 7:03), Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 11.9.2014 21:14, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 11/09/14 18:59, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> On 10.9.2014 22:39, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>>> The bad news is that the rest don't seem to moving graduating from the
>>>> Needs Review state.
>>>
>>> ISTM that many patches
>>>
>>> (b) in 'waiting on author' are not really waiting, because the author
>>> already responded / posted a new version of the patch
>>>
>>> Except that the patch status was not updated, whis makes it really
>>> difficult to spot patches that currently need a review :-(
>>>
>>
>> I think that still means patch is 'waiting for author' as author is
>> responsible for changing this.
>
> In that case it was meant as a plea to the authors to update this ;-)
>
>
> Tomas
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-09-12 01:44:39 | Re: vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order? |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-09-12 01:32:44 | Re: proposal: ignore null fields in not relation type composite type based constructors |