| From: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-02 21:43:11 |
| Message-ID: | 540639EF.6060608@wi3ck.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/02/2014 09:32 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> I think it's much better to make it the default behaviour in plpgsql2
> than to add a new syntax to plpgsql,
> because then we don't have to argue what to call the keyword or where to put it.
This should in NO CASE be any new syntax to plpgsql or plpgsql2. If you
cannot get that same syntax to apply to default client queries, then the
whole idea is bogus because it will confuse developers more than it
helps you with your particular way of thinking.
Regards,
Jan
--
Jan Wieck
Senior Software Engineer
http://slony.info
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa | 2014-09-02 21:47:04 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2014-09-02 21:34:14 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |