Re: PL/pgSQL 2

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date: 2014-09-02 12:41:03
Message-ID: 5405BADF.4050302@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/2/14 2:29 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> In the mailing list thread that you linked there, Tom suggested using
> "STRICT UPDATE ..." to mean that updating 0 or >1 rows is an error
> (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16397.1356106923@sss.pgh.pa.us)
> What happened to that proposal?

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27477.1361916222@sss.pgh.pa.us

I can't find Peter's email right now, but basically nobody liked the
suggestion in the end.

.marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Pedela 2014-09-02 12:41:13 Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-09-02 12:38:31 Re: PL/pgSQL 2