Re: PL/pgSQL 2

From: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)nosys(dot)es>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date: 2014-09-02 09:52:34
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/09/14 11:44, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> For 9.4, we have the media already saying "Postgres has NoSQL
> capabilities" (which is only partially true). For x.y we could
> have the media saying "Postgres adds Oracle compatibility" (which
> would be only partially true). But that brings a lot of users to
> postgres, and that helps us all.
> Partial true can enforce so lot of people will hate postgres too.
> False promises are wrong

Then let's stop talking about postgres being NoSQL. NoSQL is
basically "schema-less" (really bad name) plus "infinite scalability"
(which basically means transparent sharding). We fail to provide the
latter very clearly...


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2014-09-02 09:55:27 Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-09-02 09:51:05 Re: PL/pgSQL 2