Re: Policy query: sponsor endorsements

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Policy query: sponsor endorsements
Date: 2014-08-27 16:39:59
Message-ID: 53FE09DF.9000208@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 08/27/2014 12:02 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I think it's better to stick to the previous way of having "users"
> endorse the feature itself. The people who developed it are credited
> in the release notes, not the press kit.

Well, we'd already told Oleg & Teodor that the release notes weren't the
appropriate place to credit *sponsors*. And I feel that the press kit
is more appropriate than the release notes for this purpose. Do note
that I'm talking about the extended press kit (i.e. the web page), not
the release announcement.

We do want to "reward" companies for supporting PostgreSQL development,
and have in the past noted which companies sponsored certain features.
Otherwise this source of development funding will dry up, and it's easy
enough for us to give a company a few lines on a web page.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2014-08-27 16:49:30 Re: Policy query: sponsor endorsements
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2014-08-27 10:49:14 Re: G+PostgreSQL Advocacy