Re: Hokey wrong versions of libpq in apt.postgresql.org

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hokey wrong versions of libpq in apt.postgresql.org
Date: 2014-08-19 15:34:37
Message-ID: 53F36E8D.2020506@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/19/2014 05:02 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> I am finally able to get back around to this and I am still calling:
> Hokey. I just loaded up a fresh precise (I assume trusty will act the
> same way) and installed postgresql. I installed it, without the PDGD
> repository and everything worked perfectly. The only error I got when
> using pgxnclient to install pg_repack was an error about not having
> libedit-dev installed. I installed it, and it was perfect. I even tested
> with create extension etc...
>
> So... If we are supposed to ship the "latest" lib... how come Debian or
> Ubuntu don't do that? They ship the latest lib for the version they are
> shipping and because of that, everything works, as expected.
>
> I iterate, the current apt.postgresql.org is not doing things correctly.
> It breaks things and it shouldn't.

FWIW, this is inconsistent with what yum.postgresql.org does - it takes
the POLA approach of packing the libpq from the major release configured
in the repo. Each major has its own sub-repo.

I find it pretty hard to justify installing a 9.3 libpq alongside a 9.1
server myself.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2014-08-19 15:35:36 Re: pg_dump refactor patch to remove global variables
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2014-08-19 15:30:00 Re: [Postgres-xc-developers] Trove with PostgreSQL-XC