Re: CSN snapshots in hot standby

From: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CSN snapshots in hot standby
Date: 2024-04-05 10:49:24
Message-ID: 53C9CD5A-4403-4FF0-9F00-8B8A00F922A7@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 5 Apr 2024, at 02:08, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> maybe we need some hooks here? Or maybe, we can take CSN here from extension somehow.

I really like the idea of CSN-provider-as-extension.
But it's very important to move on with CSN, at least on standby, to make CSN actually happen some day.
So, from my perspective, having LSN-as-CSN is already huge step forward.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2024-04-05 10:55:16 Re: Another WaitEventSet resource leakage in back branches
Previous Message shveta malik 2024-04-05 10:39:01 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby