Re: Minmax indexes

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minmax indexes
Date: 2014-07-10 21:50:06
Message-ID: 53BF0A8E.8040409@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/10/2014 02:30 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> How is this different from "ALTER TABLE foo SET (FILLFACTOR=80); " or
> from "ALTER TABLE foo ALTER bar SET STORAGE EXTERNAL; " ?
>
> we don't get a notice for these cases either

Good idea. We should also emit notices for those. Well, maybe not for
fillfactor.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2014-07-10 22:01:10 Re: Missing autocomplete for CREATE DATABASE
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2014-07-10 21:30:32 Re: Minmax indexes