From: | Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: transam README small fix |
Date: | 2016-03-04 19:26:31 |
Message-ID: | 53B2C7BB-103E-4401-BE2E-D40AA3D1D59C@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks.
Stas Kelvich
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
> On 04 Mar 2016, at 22:14, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> Transaction function call sequence description in transam/README is slightly outdated. Select now handled by PortalRunSelect instead of ProcessQuery. It is also hard to follow what tabulation there means — sometimes that means “function called by function”, sometimes it isn't. So I’ve also changed it to actual call nesting.
>
> After some study, this looks good to me, so committed.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-03-04 19:37:04 | Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c) |
Previous Message | David Steele | 2016-03-04 19:14:34 | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer) |