Re: transam README small fix

From: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transam README small fix
Date: 2016-03-04 19:26:31
Message-ID: 53B2C7BB-103E-4401-BE2E-D40AA3D1D59C@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks.

Stas Kelvich
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

> On 04 Mar 2016, at 22:14, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> Transaction function call sequence description in transam/README is slightly outdated. Select now handled by PortalRunSelect instead of ProcessQuery. It is also hard to follow what tabulation there means — sometimes that means “function called by function”, sometimes it isn't. So I’ve also changed it to actual call nesting.
>
> After some study, this looks good to me, so committed.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-03-04 19:37:04 Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c)
Previous Message David Steele 2016-03-04 19:14:34 Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer)