Re: 60 core performance with 9.3

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 60 core performance with 9.3
Date: 2014-06-27 09:30:59
Message-ID: 53AD39D3.5080202@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 27/06/14 21:19, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-06-27 14:28:20 +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>> My feeling is spinlock or similar, 'perf top' shows
>>
>> kernel find_busiest_group
>> kernel _raw_spin_lock
>>
>> as the top time users.
>
> Those don't tell that much by themselves, could you do a hierarchical
> profile? I.e. perf record -ga? That'll at least give the callers for
> kernel level stuff. For more information compile postgres with
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
>

Excellent suggestion, will do next week!

regards

Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Soni M 2014-06-29 08:14:19 Postgres Replaying WAL slowly
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-06-27 09:19:51 Re: 60 core performance with 9.3