Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD

From: Dave McGuire <mcguire(at)neurotica(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sebastian Reitenbach <sebastia(at)l00-bugdead-prods(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, vax(at)openbsd(dot)org, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, port-vax(at)netbsd(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD
Date: 2014-06-24 18:00:46
Message-ID: 53A9BCCE.3030006@neurotica.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/24/2014 12:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Sebastian Reitenbach" <sebastia(at)l00-bugdead-prods(dot)de> writes:
>> OK, that was easy:
>
>> $ cd /usr/ports/databases/postgresql
>> $ make install
>> ===> postgresql-client-9.3.4p0 requires shared libraries .
>
>> OpenBSD VAX is static only, so no postgresql on OpenBSD
>> VAX before shared libraries will ever be made working on it.
>
> Ouch. We long ago passed the point of no return as far as requiring
> shared library support: there's too much backend functionality that's
> in separate shared libraries rather than being linked directly into
> the core executable. I doubt anyone will be interested in taking on
> the task of supporting a parallel all-static build.
>
> I think this means we can write off VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD as a viable
> platform for Postgres :-(. I'm sad to hear it, but certainly have
> not got the cycles personally to prevent it.

Nonono...NetBSD/vax has had shared library support for many years.
It's only OpenBSD that has that limitation.

-Dave

--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ/3
New Kensington, PA

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anders Magnusson 2014-06-24 18:00:53 Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-06-24 17:51:33 Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout