Re: Possible index issue on 9.5 slave

From: Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible index issue on 9.5 slave
Date: 2014-06-19 03:09:22
Message-ID: 53A25462.2000208@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19/06/14 11:58, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've just run into an index issue on 9.5 HEAD on a slave (master and slave
>> both compiled from 66802246e22d51858cd543877fcfddf24e6812f2); details
>> below (I have only found one index on the slave where the issue occurs so far).
>
> Would you mind running my btreecheck tool on both systems? That might
> shed some light on this. You can get it from:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZRtV+xmRWLWq6c-x7czvwavFdwFi4St1zz4dDgFH4yN4g@mail.gmail.com
> .
>
> I suggest running bt_parent_index_verify() and bt_leftright_verify()
> on all indexes on both systems. It shouldn't take too long.

Interesting, I'll take a look later.

Thanks

Ian Barwick

--
Ian Barwick http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-06-19 03:19:57 Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink
Previous Message Joe Conway 2014-06-19 03:04:39 Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink