| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is it "JSQuery"? |
| Date: | 2014-06-15 21:07:31 |
| Message-ID: | 539E0B13.1020200@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/15/2014 04:58 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I've been poking at the various json-query syntaxes you forwarded, and
> none of them really work for the actual jsquery features. Also, the
> existing syntax has the advantage of being *simple*, relatively
> speaking, and reasonably similar to JSONPATH.
>
> In other words, what I'm saying is: I don't think there's an existing,
> poplular syntax we could reasonably use.
>
Not to mention the similarity to tsquery, which is something not to be
despised.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maxence Ahlouche | 2014-06-15 22:01:15 | Re: [GSoC] Clustering in MADlib - status update |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-06-15 20:58:18 | Re: Why is it "JSQuery"? |