| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add CREATE support to event triggers |
| Date: | 2014-06-15 00:44:03 |
| Message-ID: | 539CEC53.5030509@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/6/14, 11:20 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> NOTICE: JSON blob: {
> "definition": [
> {
> "clause": "owned",
> "fmt": "OWNED BY %{owner}D",
> "owner": {
> "attrname": "a",
> "objname": "t1",
> "schemaname": "public"
> }
> }
> ],
> "fmt": "ALTER SEQUENCE %{identity}D %{definition: }s",
> "identity": {
> "objname": "t1_a_seq",
> "schemaname": "public"
> }
> }
> NOTICE: expanded: ALTER SEQUENCE public.t1_a_seq OWNED BY public.t1.a
Apologies if this has been discussed and I missed it, but shouldn't part of the JSON be a field that indicates what command is being run? It doesn't seem wise to conflate detecting what the command is with the overall format string.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-15 01:12:21 | Atomics hardware support table & supported architectures |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-15 00:39:27 | Re: UPDATE SET (a,b,c) = (SELECT ...) versus rules |