Re: TAP backpatching policy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TAP backpatching policy
Date: 2017-05-31 05:16:21
Message-ID: 5397.1496207781@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> In the end, the experiences I've had with pg_dump of late and trying to
> ensure that pg_dump 9.6 is able to work all the way back to *7.0*, makes
> me think that this notion of putting the one-and-only real test-suite we
> have into the core repo almost laughable.

um... why are you trying to do that? We moved the goalposts last fall:

Author: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Branch: master [64f3524e2] 2016-10-12 12:20:02 -0400

Remove pg_dump/pg_dumpall support for dumping from pre-8.0 servers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-05-31 05:20:14 Re: TAP backpatching policy
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2017-05-31 05:10:06 Re: ECPG: pg_type.h file is not synced