| From: | Linos <info(at)linos(dot)es> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: performance regression in 9.2/9.3 |
| Date: | 2014-06-09 15:00:23 |
| Message-ID: | 5395CC07.1000301@linos.es |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/06/14 16:55, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Linos <info(at)linos(dot)es> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is this information enough? I could try to assemble a complete test case but I have very little time right now because I am trying to meet a very difficult deadline.
>>
>> I will do ASAP if needed.
> It is not -- it was enough to diagnose a potential problem but not the
> solution. Tom was pretty clear: "I'd like to see a self-contained
> test case, by which I mean full details about the table/view schemas;
> it's not clear whether the actual data is very important here.".
>
> merlin
Merlin, in the email I replied to are attached the table/view schemas, I was referring to this information as enough or not. Tom said "full details about the table/view schemas" and these details are attached to the original email I replied to.
Miguel Angel.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-06-09 15:00:52 | Re: Inaccuracy in VACUUM's tuple count estimates |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2014-06-09 14:55:23 | Re: performance regression in 9.2/9.3 |