| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Replacement for OSSP-UUID for Linux and BSD |
| Date: | 2014-05-28 02:21:26 |
| Message-ID: | 53854826.8050305@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/27/14, 2:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
>> On 27 May 2014 18:33:48 EEST, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> If we were going to do it like that, I'd vote for
>>>
>>> --with-uuid={ossp,e2fs,bsd}
>>>
>>> with no default at present (ie you can't say just "--with-uuid",
>>> though we'd have the option to allow that in future). But I doubt
>>> this is better than the --with-foo-uuid spelling.
>
>> FWIW, --with-uuid=foo looks much clearer to me.
>
> OK, I'll make it so.
I'm shocked that this new feature has been committed post beta with less
than 48 hours of review time over a holiday weekend. This issue has
been known for years. Why does it need to be solved right now?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-28 02:37:22 | Re: [PATCH] Replacement for OSSP-UUID for Linux and BSD |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-05-28 02:18:29 | Re: [PATCH] Replacement for OSSP-UUID for Linux and BSD |