Re: vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuumdb --all --analyze-in-stages - wrong order?
Date: 2014-05-19 17:51:27
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/18/14, 3:52 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
> I am looking on --analyze-in-stages option. If I understand well,
> motivation for this option is a get some minimal statistic for databases
> in minimal time. But when I tested, I found so iterations are per
> databases, not per stages - some first database get a maximum statistics
> and second has zero statistics. Isn't it unpractical?

Yes. Let me see if I can fix that.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-05-19 18:01:33 Re: uuid-ossp (Re: [pgsql-packagers] Postgresapp 9.4 beta build ready)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-19 17:45:15 Re: buildfarm: strange OOM failures on markhor (running CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY)