PGDLLEXPORTing all GUCs?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: PGDLLEXPORTing all GUCs?
Date: 2014-05-07 08:44:05
Message-ID: 5369F255.7000008@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi all

As part of development on BDR the issue of GUC globals not being
PGDLLEXPORT'ed has been run into a few times.

Is there any reason _not_ to PGDLLEXPORT all GUCs, other than cosmetic
concerns?

Barring objections I'll post a patch to do this tomorrow.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2014-05-07 09:06:32 Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-05-07 08:36:40 Re: Wanted: jsonb on-disk representation documentation