Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL
Date: 2014-05-06 18:49:47
Message-ID: 53692ECB.4060403@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/2/14, 2:22 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I'm aware and I really am not convinced that pushing all of this to
> contrib modules using the hooks is the right approach- for one thing, it
> certainly doesn't seem to me that we've actually gotten a lot of
> traction from people to actually make use of them and keep them updated.
> We've had many of those hooks for quite a while.

What is there to update? The stuff works and doesn't necessarily need
any changes.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-05-06 18:51:18 Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-06 18:34:36 Re: pg_shmem_allocations view