From: | Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Victor Wagner <v(dot)wagner(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade check fails on Solaris 10 |
Date: | 2019-09-24 07:00:08 |
Message-ID: | 53648cc938733a160d752cf8ea5c8b48@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-09-23 19:41, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Sep-23, Marina Polyakova wrote:
>> The branch REL9_4_STABLE (commit
>> 8a17afe84be6fefe76d0d2f4d26c5ee075e64487)
>> has the same issue - according to the release table [2] it is still
>> supported, isn't it?...
>
> Yeah, but pg_upgrade is in contrib/ in 9.4, so nowhere as good as from
> 9.5 onwards; and it's going to die in a couple of months anyway, so I'm
> not thrilled about fixing this there.
>
> If you *need* to have this fixed in 9.4, we can do that, but do you?
No, we don't. I just noticed :-)
--
Marina Polyakova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Victor Wagner | 2019-09-24 07:18:59 | PostgreSQL12 and older versions of OpenSSL |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2019-09-24 06:25:08 | Re: Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses |