Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4

From: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4
Date: 2014-04-23 19:11:12
Message-ID: 53581050.1060208@darrenduncan.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

I agree with what Jonathan said here. -- Darren Duncan

On 2014-04-23, 2:13 AM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:29 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> "Big features", that is the ones we want to lead with in press stuff:
>>
>> * JSONB et. al.
>
> I think to echo some of the earlier statements, the important thing is how we label this feature. "Enhanced JSON access that rivals other NoSQL system speeds" or the like would generate a lot of buzz. And we can definitely play-up the GIN indexing improvements around this and show what other data types / systems reap the benefits of those.
>> * Logical Decoding/Changeset Extraction (need a marketing name for this
>> feature, I like Logical Streaming Replication, but that's not complete yet)
>
> Then perhaps we hold off highlighting this feature, similar to what we did with mat views for 9.3? Ultimately, once "logical streaming replication" is complete, the tag line is "replicate PostgreSQL information into *any* system"
>
> Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-04-23 19:44:24 Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2014-04-23 09:13:24 Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4