| From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) |
| Date: | 2014-04-23 08:20:42 |
| Message-ID: | 535777DA.3000203@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 23/04/14 00:40, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?
>
> FWIW, I still don't have any strong opinion here. I defer to others on
> this question.
>
I vote for changing it, even though neither option is ideal I think that
given the nature of datatype the current default will break inserts for
common usage pattern and that's much worse than not being able to use
the index for some operators.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2014-04-23 09:15:01 | Typo in doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml? s/tranche/trance? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-23 00:50:20 | Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2014-04-23 08:26:40 | Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-23 08:11:23 | Re: Missing pfree in logical_heap_rewrite_flush_mappings() |