| From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
| Date: | 2014-04-22 06:26:12 |
| Message-ID: | 53560B84.4040003@catalyst.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22/04/14 09:25, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-04-21 17:21:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:08:51PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
>>> If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great
>>> but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that
>>> no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates
>>> helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL.
>>
>> I don't think we would even implement a run-time control for Linux or
>> Windows for this, so I don't even think it is a FreeBSD issue.
>
> I think some of the arguments in this thread are pretty damn absurd. We
> have just introduced dynamic_shared_memory_type.
>
+1
I was just thinking the same thing...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-22 06:44:10 | Re: assertion failure 9.3.4 |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-04-22 06:16:44 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |