From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: assertion failure 9.3.4 |
Date: | 2014-04-22 01:04:48 |
Message-ID: | 5355C030.8010503@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
All,
I've taken a stab at creating a reproduceable test case based on the
characterisitics of the production issues I'm seeing. But clearly
there's an element I'm missing, because I'm not able to produce the bug
with a pgbench-based test case.
My current test has FKs, updating both FK'd tables, updating both
indexed and non-indexed columns, and doing multiple updates in the same
transaction, and lock-blocking.
Files are attached in case someone has better ideas. queue_bench.sql is
the setup file, and then you do:
pgbench -n -T 600 -c 15 -j 5 -f queue_adder.bench -f queue_worker.bench
-f queue_worker.bench -f queue_worker.bench -f queue_worker.bench {dbname}
... or whatever levels of c and j make sense on your hardware.
FWIW, this particular test case might make a nice destruction test case
for replication testing, too.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
queue_bench.sql | text/x-sql | 2.5 KB |
queue_adder.bench | text/plain | 101 bytes |
queue_worker.bench | text/plain | 95 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-04-22 01:06:35 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-04-22 00:59:34 | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? |