| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)freebsd(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Francois Tigeot <ftigeot(at)wolfpond(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
| Date: | 2014-04-21 16:38:59 |
| Message-ID: | 535549A3.9060907@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/21/2014 12:25 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> 1. OS developers are not the target audience for GUCs. If the OS
>> developers want to test and can't be botherrd with building with a
>> couple of different parameters then I'm not very impressed.
>>
>> 2. We should be trying to get rid of GUCs where possible, and only
>> add them when we must. The more there are the more we confuse users.
>> If a packager can pick a default surely they can pick build options too.
> Thank you for the lecture Andrew! Really pleasant way to treat a user
> and a fan of the system. :)
>
>
I confess to being mightily confused.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-04-21 16:40:00 | Re: assertion failure 9.3.4 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-04-21 16:36:17 | Re: Composite Datums containing toasted fields are a bad idea(?) |